# Replication audit report — ECON 282E

*One page. Used for the internal audit in the final project (each member audits another member's component) and for the peer replication audit in HW2.*

**Auditor:**  
**Component audited (and its author, for the internal audit; anonymous for HW2):**  
**Commit / version audited:**  
**Machine, OS, Python version:**

## 1. Does it run?
- Command run:
- Ran from a clean environment? (yes / no; what you had to fix)
- Wall time:

## 2. Do the numbers reproduce?
Pick three reported numbers, including the headline one.

| Reported number | Where reported | Your value | Match? (tolerance) |
|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |

## 3. Is the validation convincing?
- Which checks support the headline result (closed form, refinement, Euler residuals, second method, verified source)?
- What check is missing that a referee would ask for?

## 4. Must fix
*Only what you can support with evidence: cite the file, line, or output.*

1.

## 5. Suggestions

1.

## 6. Overall
One sentence: would you trust this component inside your own project? Why or why not?